Here is a draft of the workplan for review and collaborative editing Gitea federation workplan - HedgeDoc
- It is no longer a spreadsheet because NLnet now has an online web interface to conveniently track the progress of each task.
- The tasks are coarse grain (5%, 10% or 20% of the total amount) because NLnet now has an online web interface that makes it convenient to submit request for payment for a partial amount. For instance if a pull request implementing followers/following is merged, and required five days of full time work, a request for payment can be made for the corresponding amount.
- Each task has been described to NLnet during the intake call yesterday and no concern was raised regarding their scope and relevance in the context of the grant.
- The description of the tasks contain a lot of detailed task which does not mean all of them need to be completed: it is quite difficult to predict how efficient the developers will be. Those that cannot be completed in time will be left out.
@6543 @Gusted @Dodecahedron @onepict could you please review the workplan and let me know if you have any question?
@onepict the Community management & Diversity task is where you’ll contribute: feel free to reword it however you prefer. You’re familiar with how NLnet works and I’d be very grateful if you could let me know if something feels off.
@6543 the work you’re doing for Vervis packaging will fit in the Testing tools and code for federation task and the milestone deliverable will be URL to new software packages to use for testing.
@Gusted @Dodecahedron all other tasks are fair game for either of you, feel free to add a task that you may be willing to work on.
During the course of this grant my work will be limited to reviewing the request for payment and doing the necessary legwork to welcome new beneficiaries and otherwise making it possible for the grant to be used effectively.