Reçu aujourd’hui:
Loïc, merci de votre disponibilité pour notre partage ce matin.
Ci-dessous quelques notes pour résumé notre discussion (dites-moi si j’ai mal compris quelque chose).
Bonne fin de journée,
Minutes
· FedeProxy aims first at allowing interactions of subscribers of forge’s services with non-subscribers (those later ones may want to interact with developers of specific forge services without being users of those services).
· A second FedeProxy may come later, allowing subscribers of a forge service to move own data to another forge service (but this second function have to be proved relevant as developers (from entreprises or independent ones) do not seem to really needing that portability facility).
· FedeProxy has made 10 (1-hour long) interviews of users of forge services and plan to analyse them in June and July.
· It is unclear what part of potential users would be keen to pay for the FedeProxy service, but the costs of operation are rather low (a simple server would operate the identity translation between the person’s and that in the targeted forge). Various possible business model could be foreseen.
· FedeProxy aims at operating a PoC involving some users to validate the interest, seize the potential market, clarify the usage and the possible business models.
Actions, next steps
· Analyse the interviews made, identify the top priority pains and needs : FedeProxy/Loïc, Pierre-Louis
· Next meetings : June 16th and July 7th, 11:00 to 12:00am : redacted to send corresponding invitations.
And I sent the following reply:
Bonjour,
Merci pour votre écoute et vos conseils, c’était un plaisir. Le résumé est fidèle, à un détail près: il n’entre pas dans le cadre du projet de clarifier les business models. C’est un point important qui a été précisé lorsque le projet a été soumis. Je confirme cependant que l’intention est bien de valider l’intérêt de l’expérimentation auprès d’une population telle que définie dans la proposition. Bien que l’ambition soit modeste elle est essentielle.
Cordialement